User blog comment:NOBODY/Nitrome wants to offer the Nitrome Wiki a regular spot on the Nitrome blog/@comment-3060206-20131203084129/@comment-1455034-20131205231848

RSK, although it does encourage speculation, we cam remove speculation. Why should Nitrome be the first to reveal the content? If we find in a game unused content, and post it to the wiki, it encourages speculation, however, we can still remove speculation.

Also, yes, it spoils the surprise, but Nitrome can password protect images, and likely, domains. If they don't want people to find it, they can place it in a domain that requires a password to enter, then when they are ready, move it to the new domain. Alternatively, they can just not upload it.

Yes, Nitrome didn't reveal it, but if they don't want us to find it, why do they put it up so that it can be accessible? When someone asked Nitrome about the unused avatars, Nitrome replied this:
 * We will never use that old Cuboy one as we decided to keep cuboy to represent Nitrome. We might use the blue one but we went so overboard on Test Subject Arena 2 that I think it may be too soon for another. 01 Dec, 2013 12:44:51 Now, Nitrome knows that we know about it, here is someone asking about it, Nitrome knows completely that it is known these unreleased avatars exist, and they are not angry or in any way against what we are doing, or that this information exists.

Now, although it does spoil Nitrome's own reveal, they don't seem to really care if we find something and post it here. Mat knows that we know about unused content undocumented on the Nitrome blog (I told him in an email during the conversation about Nitrome Wiki), and he took no offense at it, or me talking about it on the Nitrome blog.

So, as you can see, Nitrome doesn't care if we reveal avatars ahead of them, and that's all we can do. Also, if people here are still against putting stuff up about stuff Nitrome didn't announce yet, then we can make a special spoiler template, so that that content can be seen if you click "[show]", and is otherwise hidden if show is not clicked.

Unused content is simple, download this free decompiler and then decompile a given .swf. I can even upload the swf to a file sharing site so if people can't find the swf, they can simply click the given link to the swf, get it, and then decompile it on there own. And I'm all for the deletion of speculation, however, if an image hints something and it is dead obvious what it is hinting at, would it be okay to put that down on sepculation on the basis that it's obvious (such as if Off the Rails had an image of an entire train, but was missing just the body of the train (such as wheels, a line of smoke, and an outline of the truck)).