User blog comment:Random-storykeeper/Prepping for Icebreaker iOS/@comment-1455034-20130617212916/@comment-3060206-20130617214419

I think the missing content is better put on another page, you know, something to do with the outside game relations and game's development while the current page focuses more on its gameplay. A lot of the points you brought up have to do with outside game relations - something that would bring the page's byte count too high. I had to take about 70,000 bytes off the page, and any extra additions might increase the page length.

If it's obvious and speculative, then it should not go on the article. Period.

The descriptions page was simply quoting text off the Icebreaker website. If people want to read Nitrome's description of the game, it should be done on their own site. We don't need a direct quoting of it.

I think comment citations are a bit of a touchy source, considering their length and how you can actually find quite a bit of this information in other updates. Try and match them to Nitrome's update logs instead of using comments.