User blog comment:NOBODY/Nitrome News: Aron Steed and the Plastic Plant/@comment-24707114-20150525131533/@comment-4628859-20150528144312

Pardon my weirdness, but now I want to hug you all (or maybe just refer to you both with the -chan suffix)! This conversation was not really a harsh argument but simply, to me, a discussion.

I believe from Frosty's comments things appeared to be placed in a different perspective that we were arguing (when I tried in several instances to make it appear I was happy and couldn't not be arguing) and that this was a serious discussion about the fate of the post and not a semi-casual conversation (if you want to have this, then go to my talk page).

I knew the Random-storykeeper -chan was not implying anything was my fault, Frosty's fault, or anyone else's fault.

Here I should also put that I'm not saying that Aaron Steed deserves disrespect for being upset about something but that just this is a misunderstanding and, as a misunderstanding, means I haven't really done anything necessary to offend him but it may appear that way to others (I add "to others" because we don't know if he is actually angry and others see the post how they want irregardless of the motive intended).

Ahh, now we have just got (what I would call a "slip", but ignore that) some light on how Random-storykeeper views this conversation. She wrote: I feel that we, the wiki, do need to have some form of respect for st33d and the rest of the Nitrome staff, and shoving your nose up in the air and saying, "I'm not at fault, please shut up and don't disagree with me" is not learning from the situation.

Here we come to another misunderstanding which, in broader terms, is an opinion founded upon perceived intention. Now it is unsure if "you" means I, "Grammar Cat", or a combination of me and Frosty's combined words.

Anyway, I do agree we should have respect for people in general, which includes the Nitrome staff, and it is a misunderstanding that I was trying to be disrespectful. Even though in some cases I was "defending my actions", I was more "discussing how logically it was illogical for a person, whether Aaron Steed or another, to have a sensible reason for anger against this blog post".

Now it is your (Random-storykeeper's) opinion that I was "shoving [my] nose up in the air and saying, "I'm not at fault, please shut up and don't disagree with me" ". To elaborate further, I never told anyone to be silent nor to not disagree with me. As for " "I'm not at fault... " ", I have been trying to show how I can't be judged as offending Aaron Steed for more than a misunderstanding.

Another interesting point is that Random-storykeeper wrote "is not learning from the situation." which is implying I, or maybe I and Frosty, should somehow glean something from what has happened and, to make an educated guess which is opinion, something that she herself would do. Her statement also stating, and this is a fact, that a response such as " ""I'm not at fault, please shut up and don't disagree with me" " implies that this is not a response that learns from the situation which could also imply, and this is conjecture, that she is saying she doesn't believe "I", or whoever this "you" is, has not learned anything from the situation.

Now I have nothing but my opinion, which is not a fact, on what she believes I should have "learn[ed]" from the situation. It would be entirely subjective the value of what she think I should have "learn[ed]"; however, so far I would say what I learned is that, next time, I should be more general when referring to Nitrome employees so that it will have a very shaky ground, irregardless of which this blog post does, for in some way "appearing" to mock someone.

Now since that's over an done with, I would like to tell you both (and any other individual who comments) that we can precede discussing this further if you wish and I would be happy to, but, I would kindly ask that you step over the presumption, that unfortunately appears to be all to human, that discussing something of an opposite view to an other's own is indicative of animosity; or, in simpler terms, "I'm not speaking angrily to you people; I'm just have a discussion and there are some 'points' to it".

@Rsk - Hey, you used "Miss Grammar Cat" again! Has been a long time since I've heard that (^-^) maybe you could you Msr instead? :P

@Frosty - Got no idea if that is a relieved smiley or happy smiley nor do I know what you mean by the "getting dumber" line. I actually wouldn't know that sometimes people give harsh advice/what could be perceived as harsh because they care if it wasn't because of a mother/daughter relationship book my mom got out. The irony to that situation is I read it but my Mom didn't and since then I found a different perspective on human actions.

I suppose you excepted I would be offended and maybe give a childish "No, you shut up!/Don't tell me what to do/You don't understand me/What do you know/ect..."? Or did you think I might even try to do the more sophisticate, but nevertheless faulty, "Don't act like my parent!" response? *Raises eyebrow in amusement*