Beta blog banners?[]
I found this video on YouTube by nitromefan1. In the comments, he said he used a swf decompiler to hack the Nitrome blog, and found these images. He found two unused banners, one called RANT!, supposedly for game tips or hints, and one called HOW?, perhaps to explain how games were created or something like that. Can anyone else find these images when decompiling the Nitrome blog? They seem like Nitrome made them. Here's the video:
| Click [show] to see this video |
|---|
|
-- 
Ayernam 
23:24, November 27, 2012 (UTC)
- I was going to say they were fake and you should email Nitrome about there legitimacy, but I found them. How banner, and Rant banner. Telling from their art style, I believe Simon Hunter did them. --Talk to NOBODY
23:57, November 27, 2012 (UTC)
- Cool! I wonder what they would have been used for, or if Nitrome will ever use them. -- Ayernam
00:18, November 28, 2012 (UTC)
- Cool! I wonder what they would have been used for, or if Nitrome will ever use them. --
Pixel Love games[]
Maybe we should remove all the links and perhaps post to Nitrome Pixel Love Wiki's list of games. It will be one less thing to update, and the links on this page aren't needed anyways, since the Pixel Love Wiki keeps the list up to date. 
Random-storykeeper 
04:30, March 9, 2014 (UTC)
- Agreed. I vote for this. --Talk to NOBODY 04:37, March 9, 2014 (UTC)
- Second! Pufflesrcute (talk) 20:35, March 9, 2014 (UTC)
- Third! 18:05, March 10, 2014 (UTC)
- Second! Pufflesrcute (talk) 20:35, March 9, 2014 (UTC)
(Re)moving Trivia section[]
I think the Trivia section is a bit of a concern...if a user was mentioned on the blog, getting their name in there would be as simple as signing up for an account. It also seems not right to imply some users are better than others by comparing how many times they were featured in the blog...? I guess from a user who was only featured once, this kind of sounds like a cry for desperation. And what about NOBODY's mention in Wiki Collaboration? How does that not count?
Erm, I do foresee disagreement to removing it, so I'd like to make another proposition for those who oppose: moving the point to its own section and organising it into a table or bulleted list. The point alone is a bit overwhelming to take in, with all the names and accomplishments being added to it and all the blue links everywhere. Random-storykeeper 05:22, April 23, 2014 (UTC)